![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The children loved the sight word program and going for a full gold star was very motivating. The average % gain from pre to post test for the 17 second graders was 13.64%. There is one Special Ed. student in this grouping (# A) who achieved an 18% increase from pre and post- test. I compared the fluency gains of the lowest 17 second grade title 1 students from 2004-05 with the 17 title 1 students from 2005-06 who had the sight word curriculum. Words per minute gains in oral reading fluency from January to May on DIBELS assessments were compared. The 2004-05 average ORF gain from Jan. to May was 10.94 words per minute for the students without the sight word curriculum. The 2005-06 average gain with the sight word curriculum was 14.64 words per minute. This is not a controlled study, only a sample. However, based on the results and the highly motivating delivery, I will ask for an additional 10 minutes daily for sight word study to be added to our title 1 time. The Marks Manager was helpful to alert us when students were not doing the lessons in order. I would be interested in hearing what the % gain others have found using the sight word program. We will be using the Super Phonics 2 next year and I am currently looking for an assessment tool to diagnose specific areas needing support. If you have any questions, my home e-mail is lynnandpaul@bendcable.com. Sincerely, Lynn Hilliard June 21st, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||